4.8 Article

Methanol-to-olefins catalysis on ERI-type molecular sieves: towards enhancing ethylene selectivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 404, 期 -, 页码 620-633

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2021.10.025

关键词

Erionite; Methanol-to-olefins; Small-pore zeolites; SAPOs

资金

  1. Chevron Energy and Technology Company
  2. Aramco RD
  3. Kwanjeong Educational Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ERI-type molecular sieves with varying Si/Al and Si/T-atom ratios showed improved performance in the methanol-to-olefins reaction. They exhibited higher ethylene-to-propylene ratios compared to other zeolites, while SAPO-17 samples had a higher C-4+ fraction. The differences in product distributions were attributed to the slower maturation of aromatic hydrocarbon-pool species and the presence of aromatics with bulky alkyl-groups in SAPO-17 samples.
ERI-type molecular sieves (SSZ-98, UZM-12, ERI-type zeolite, SAPO-17) are synthesized with varying Si/Al = 5-9 and Si/T-atoms = 0.034-0.12 using several organic structure-directing agents (OSDAs), and evaluated as catalysts for the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) reaction. SAPO-34 (Si/T-atoms = 0.089) and SSZ-13 (Si/Al = 15) are also prepared and tested for comparison. The ERI-type zeolites gave improved ethylene-to-propylene ratios (E/P = 1.1-1.9) over SSZ-13 (E/P = 0.82) and SAPO-34 (E/P = 0.85). The SAPO-17 samples produced an E/P of 0.7-1.1 and a generally high C-4+ fraction. The differences observed in the olefins product distributions between the zeolites with low framework Si/Al (E/P > 1.5) and SAPO-17 with low Si/T-atom < 0.1 (E/P <= 1 and high C-4+) are the result of slower maturation of aromatic hydrocarbon-pool (HP) species and the presence of aromatics with bulky alkyl-groups (C-3-C-4) in the SAPO-17 samples. The rapid formation of cyclic intermediates and the shift in their composition towards less-methylated ((CH3)(n <= 4)) methylbenzenes and methylnaphthalenes are found to be key to enhancing the ethylene selectivity in ERI-type molecular sieves. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据