4.5 Article

A statistical approach to boost soluble expression of E. coli-derived virus-like particles in shake-flask cultivation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 347, 期 -, 页码 56-66

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.02.005

关键词

Statistical approaches; Virus-like particles; Hepatitis B core; Expression conditions; Escherichia coli

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a statistical approach to optimize the expression conditions of HBc-VLP in the Escherichia coli expression system. The results showed that post-induction temperature and shaker-speed had a significant impact on the protein yield. Additionally, sufficient oxygen level was required during induction.
Hepatitis B core virus-like particles (HBc-VLP) have been widely used as carrier platforms to present an epitope of interest. Escherichia coli expression system is cost effective and produces high yields of recombinant protein. However major drawbacks include difficulties in obtaining soluble expression and tendency to form inclusion bodies. To boost solubility of proteins during expression of E. coli-derived HBc-VLPs carrying EBNA1 epitope, a statistical approach involving fractional factorial design and response surface methodology was used. For the first time, this approach was applied to quantitatively determine the impact of key parameters in shake-flask cultivation. Expression conditions including post-induction temperature and shaker-speed, and cell density at induction were optimized. Based on native agarose gel electrophoresis, optimized soluble protein cellular yield was 210.5 mg g(-1) dry cell mass and volumetric yield was 272 mg L-1 of culture media. Findings highlight: 1) the significant interaction between post-induction temperature and shaker-speed on production, and; 2) sufficient oxygen level is required during induction. It is concluded that this statistical approach can be practically applied to optimize expression of HBc-VLP in shake-flask cultivation, and to determine key parameters for large-scale productions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据