4.5 Article

Microstructure aware modeling of biochemical transport in arterial blood clots

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110692

关键词

Thrombus; Hemodynamics; Transport; Microstructure; Thrombolysis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation, United States of America [ACI-1532235, ACI-1532236]
  2. University of Colorado Boulder, United States of America
  3. Colorado State University, United States of America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops a microstructure aware model for species transport within and around a macroscale thrombus, using a custom preconditioned fictitious domain formulation for thrombus-hemodynamics interactions. The research demonstrates the formation of coherent flow structures around the thrombus and characterizes species transport from bulk flow to the thrombus boundary.
Flow-mediated transport of biochemical species is central to thrombotic phenomena. Comprehensive three-dimensional modeling of flow-mediated transport around realistic macroscale thrombi poses challenges owing to their arbitrary heterogeneous microstructure. Here, we develop a microstructure aware model for species transport within and around a macroscale thrombus by devising a custom preconditioned fictitious domain formulation for thrombus-hemodynamics interactions, and coupling it with a fictitious domain advection- diffusion formulation for transport. Microstructural heterogeneities are accounted through a hybrid discrete particle-continuum approach for the thrombus interior. We present systematic numerical investigations on unsteady arterial flow within and around a three-dimensional macroscale thrombus; demonstrate the formation of coherent flow structures around the thrombus which organize advective transport; illustrate the role of the permeation processes at the thrombus boundary and subsequent intra-thrombus transport; and characterize species transport from bulk flow to the thrombus boundary and vice versa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据