4.2 Article

Time of Day of Vaccination Affects SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses in an Observational Study of Health Care Workers

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 124-129

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/07487304211059315

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; HCW; Spike antibody; time of day

资金

  1. NIH [K24-HL105664, P01-AG009975, R01-HL128538]
  2. Wellcome Investigator Award [200838/Z/16/Z]
  3. UK Medical Research Councilproject grant [MR/R022011/1]
  4. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science, China [2018-I2M-2-002]
  5. NCATS Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center [5UL1TR002541-02]
  6. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  7. Wellcome [110110/Z/15/Z]
  8. MRC [MR/R022011/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Wellcome Trust [200838/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic presents unprecedented challenges to global public health, with vaccinations playing a crucial role in slowing down the spread of the virus and reducing disease severity. Factors such as vaccination timing, type, participant demographics, and days post-vaccination influence the antibody response, offering insights for optimizing vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global crisis with unprecedented challenges for public health. Vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 have slowed the incidence of new infections and reduced disease severity. As the time of day of vaccination has been reported to influence host immune responses to multiple pathogens, we quantified the influence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination time, vaccine type, participant age, sex, and days post-vaccination on anti-Spike antibody responses in health care workers. The magnitude of the anti-Spike antibody response is associated with the time of day of vaccination, vaccine type, participant age, sex, and days post-vaccination. These results may be relevant for optimising SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据