4.6 Article

Structural basis of RNA polymerase recycling by the Swi2/Snf2 family of ATPase RapA in Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 297, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101404

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM087350, R35 GM131860]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Escherichia coli, the ATPase RapA from the Swi2/Snf2 family has been found to enhance RNAP recycling by binding to RNAP away from the DNA-binding main channel and allosterically closing the RNAP clamp, thereby preventing nonspecific DNA binding and hindering PTC formation. This mechanism allows RapA to act as a guardian of RNAP, enhancing transcription efficiency without affecting the binding of promoter DNA recognition factors.
After transcription termination, cellular RNA polymerases (RNAPs) are occasionally trapped on DNA, impounded in an undefined post-termination complex (PTC), limiting the free RNAP pool and subsequently leading to inefficient transcription. In Escherichia coli, a Swi2/Snf2 family of ATPase called RapA is known to be involved in countering such inefficiency through RNAP recycling; however, the precise mechanism of this recycling is unclear. To better understand its mechanism, here we determined the structures of two sets of E. coli RapA-RNAP complexes, along with the RNAP core enzyme and the elongation complex, using cryo-EM. These structures revealed the large conformational changes of RNAP and RapA upon their association that has been implicated in the hindrance of PTC formation. Our results along with DNA-binding assays reveal that although RapA binds RNAP away from the DNA-binding main channel, its binding can allosterically close the RNAP clamp, thereby preventing its nonspecific DNA binding and PTC formation. Taken together, we propose that RapA acts as a guardian of RNAP by which RapA prevents nonspecific DNA binding of RNAP without affecting the binding of promoter DNA recognition a factor, thereby enhancing RNAP recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据