4.6 Article

Structural and biochemical characterization of the prenylated flavin mononucleotide-dependent indole-3-carboxylic acid decarboxylase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 298, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101771

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [pre-FAB ADG_695013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides structural and biochemical insights into the indole-3-carboxylic acid decarboxylase, a member of the UbiD enzyme family. The enzyme likely undergoes an open-closed transition as a consequence of domain motion, which is coupled to catalysis. The study also demonstrates the coupling of indole-3-carboxylic acid decarboxylase with carboxylic acid reductase to produce indole-3-carboxyaldehyde from indole + CO2 under ambient conditions, providing evidence for a common mode of action in the UbiD enzyme family.
The ubiquitous UbiD family of reversible decarboxylases is implicated in a wide range of microbial processes and depends on the prenylated flavin mononucleotide cofactor for catalysis. However, only a handful of UbiD family members have been characterized in detail, and comparison between these has suggested considerable variability in enzyme dynamics and mechanism linked to substrate specificity. In this study, we provide structural and biochemical insights into the indole-3carboxylic acid decarboxylase, representing an UbiD enzyme activity distinct from those previously studied. Structural insights from crystal structure determination combined with small-angle X-ray scattering measurements reveal that the enzyme likely undergoes an open-closed transition as a consequence of domain motion, an event that is likely coupled to catalysis. We also demonstrate that the indole-3-carboxylic acid decarboxylase can be coupled with carboxylic acid reductase to produce indole-3-carboxyaldehyde from indole + CO2 under ambient conditions. These insights provide further evidence for a common mode of action in the widespread UbiD enzyme family.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据