4.4 Article

The role of endometrial staining for CD138 as a marker of chronic endometritis in predicting live birth

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02374-z

关键词

Plasma cells; Endometritis; Infertility; Pregnancy; Fertilization in vitro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that endometrial plasma cells are present in half of the general infertile population, but do not predict implantation, clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, or live birth rates at low levels.
Purpose Chronic endometritis (CE) is diagnosed via endometrial biopsy and staining for plasma cells. A threshold plasma cell count that identifies CE and predicts pregnancy outcomes has not been established, and the prevalence of plasma cells in the general infertile population is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of plasma cells in the general infertile population and whether a threshold exists which predicts live birth. Methods Endometrial samples were obtained prospectively from 80 women undergoing IVF, embedded in paraffin, and stained for plasma cells using mouse mono-clonal antibody for CD138. Slides were reviewed at 20x magnification and 10 random images captured. Three reviewers graded each image for plasma cells. Participants underwent single, euploid, and frozen blastocyst transfer. Results Forty-nine percent of samples had >= 1 plasma cell across 10 HPFs, 11% had >= 5 cells across 10 HPFs, and 4% had >= 10 cells across 10 HPFs. There was no difference in prevalence between those who did and did not achieve live birth. Using thresholds of 1, 5, and 10 plasma cells per 10 HPFs, there were no differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, or live birth rates between patients with and without CE. Conclusion Endometrial plasma cells are present in half the general infertile population and do not predict implantation, clinical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy loss, or live birth rates at low levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据