4.6 Article

Determination of the formulation and curing conditions of thermosetting epoxy resins for optimizing their properties and future use in gelcasting process

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.52093

关键词

epoxy resin; formulation; manufacturing; rheology; thermal techniques

资金

  1. Safran
  2. CIFRE thesis under ANRT [2017/1672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the suitability of epoxy resins for gelcasting and finds that the BDGE-TEPA system is more suitable than the RDGE-TEPA system.
This work investigates the suitability of epoxy resins for possible use in an industrial gelcasting process. Two different formulations are studied using complementary experimental techniques. Both reactive formulations are based on a difunctional epoxy prepolymer (aliphatic BDGE or aromatic RDGE) mixed with a polyamine hardener (TEPA). The combination of analytical chemistry (NMR and FTIR spectroscopy) and calorimetric measurements (DSC) are used to determine the optimal epoxy/amine ratio for each reactive formulation. The gelation and vitrification times are investigated by dynamic rheometry through kinetic analyses over a large range of fixed temperature. It is found that the RDGE-TEPA mixture is more reactive than BDGE-TEPA with shorter curing starting times. The thermomechanical analyses performed on both optimized formulations show that the RDGE-TEPA material presents better performances after curing (T-g close to 80 degrees C) than the BDGE-TEPA system (T-g lower than ambient temperature). Then, the effects of the cooling cycle on the thermomechanical profile of each polymer are investigated. The RDGE-TEPA formulation is found to be much more subject to the formation of internal stresses created during the cross-linking and cooling step than the BDGE-TEPA material. Considering all these criteria, the BDGE-TEPA system is ultimately more suitable for the gelcasting process than RDGE-TEPA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据