4.6 Article

Isocyanate-free synthesis of ureas and polyureas via ruthenium catalyzed dehydrogenation of amines and formamides

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.52088

关键词

catalysts; synthesis and processing techniques; thermal properties

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [53041-UNI7]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1609765, CHE-1609796]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethyl formate facilitates the formylation of amines and diamines to form formamides and diformamides, which can be further dehydrogenated to produce ureas and polyureas using ruthenium pincer catalysts. The synthetic approach allows for the preparation of ureas and polyureas with high molecular weights without the use of high pressure conditions or isocyanates, addressing health concerns associated with the latter.
Ethyl formate is very effective for the formylation of amines and diamines to yield formamides and diformamides, respectively. Subsequent dehydrogenation of 1:1 mixtures of formamides and amines or diformamides and diamines with ruthenium pincer catalysts furnishes ureas and polyureas, respectively. This approach provides access to a large structural variety of ureas and polyureas because a wide range of primary amines and diamines are readily converted to the corresponding ureas and polyureas. Small molecule ureas were isolated in yields of up to 95%, whereas polyureas were isolated in lower yields (up to 68%) due to strong adhesion to the reaction flask and poor solubility impeding product removal. Furthermore, the ease with which hydrogen can be removed from the reaction medium enables the synthesis of polyureas with molecular weights that are among the highest reported to date (M-n up to 31,100 g mol(-1)). Notably, this synthetic approach does not necessitate high pressure conditions, simplifying equipment needed for their preparation, and it avoids the use of isocyanates, which have significant health concerns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据