4.6 Article

Enhanced electrochemical performance of neural electrodes based on PEDOT:PSS hydrogel

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.51804

关键词

conducting polymers; electrochemistry; interfaces; manufacturing; morphology; surfaces

资金

  1. Guangdong Science and Technology Research Program [2019A050503007]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Program [JCYJ20170818152810899, JCYJ20170818154035069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conductive polymer hydrogel (CPH) made from PEDOT:PSS successfully modified on platinum (Pt) substrate exhibited excellent performance, providing great potential for applications in neural implants and other flexible electronics.
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) has attracted much attention on applications of neural interfaces and other biomedical fields due to its excellent electrical performances and good biocompatibility. However, its stability still remains challenge. Here, a conductive polymer hydrogel (CPH) made from PEDOT:PSS is modified on platinum (Pt) substrate successfully through electrochemical gelation, employing copper (Cu) as the sacrificial layer. The as-prepared CPH electrode provides extensive large surface area with good adhesion after dried in the air. The uniform flower-like structure helps the electrode achieve a significantly low square impedance down to 10.09 omega cm(2) (reduction of 54.89%) at 1 kHz, compared with that of bare Pt. It exhibits a high cathodic charge storage capacity (CSCc) up to 82.36 mC cm(-2), about 27 and 16.18 times higher than that of bare Pt and PEDOT:PSS coating respectively. Besides, no obviously variation of CSCc occurs after 5 CV cycles in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and superior charge injection capacity (CIC) was also observed. Such CPH material presents great potential for preparing functionalized flexible electrode, implying promising applications on neural implants and other flexible electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据