4.6 Article

Innovative non-thermal plasma coating for core-shell CaCu3Ti4O12 material

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 130, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0061180

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the successful coating of silicon oxide onto CCTO grains using an innovative non-thermal plasma treatment method, resulting in improved material properties. By controlling the gas mixture and plasma conditions, the thickness and homogeneity of the shell can be controlled, offering a new approach for the synthesis of core-shell materials.
Colossal permittivity of CaCu3Ti4O12 (CCTO) makes it a very interesting candidate for capacitor applications. To improve its properties, an innovative physical method based on a pulsed non-thermal micro-plasma treatment was set up to realize the coating of CCTO's grains (core) with silicon oxide (shell). This method is adapted to control the thickness and homogeneity of the shell, which will allow a better control of grain-grain boundary interfaces and improve the properties of this material. Best result is obtained for the set of gas mixture: Ar/O-2/hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) = 2028 N cm(3) min(-1)/7.84 N cm(3) min(-1)/523 mg h(-1), respectively, in plasma with a shell thickness of 50 nm. This study offers a new opportunity to quickly synthetize core-shell materials with a dry technique and without almost no secondary product resulting from the chemical reaction because it is in the gaseous state. A complete analysis of the plasma by optical emission spectroscopy in the UV-visible range shows that HMDSO molecules are totally dissociated in atomic (Si, C, and O) or simple radical species (C-2 and CH) in the plasma phase. In addition, several thermometer species (OH degrees, CH, CN, N-2, and N-2(+)) are used to estimate excitation temperatures of the plasma (Trot, Tvib, and Te = 300 K, 2400-3700 K, and 5.3 eV, respectively) that clearly shows the non-equilibrium character and the efficiency of this plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据