4.6 Article

Screening and effect evaluation of chemical inducers for enhancing astaxanthin and lipid production in mixotrophic Chromochloris zofingiensis

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 159-176

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-021-02618-6

关键词

Chromochloris zofingiensis; Astaxanthin; Lipid; Chemical inducer; Regulatory mechanism

资金

  1. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515110591, 2019B1515120002]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2019YFD0900302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A two-stage screening approach using chemical inducers was conducted to enhance astaxanthin and lipid production in mixotrophic Chromochloris zofingiensis. Results showed that oxidants and pyruvic acid significantly increased the contents of astaxanthin and lipids in the algae. The study highlights the potential of chemical inducers for improving production in mixotrophic C. zofingiensis.
A two-stage screening approach of chemical inducers was carried out to evaluate the positive effect on enhancing astaxanthin and lipid production in mixotrophic Chromochloris zofingiensis. The results demonstrated that oxidants were able to increase the astaxanthin content high up to 11.4 mg g(-1) biomass, while pyruvic acid promoted the cell growth and increased the contents of astaxanthin and lipids up to 10.7 mg g(-1) and 66.1% dry weight. The highest yield (87.0 mg L-1) and productivity (7.3 mg L-1 day(-1)) of astaxanthin were obtained in parallel with high lipid productivity (459.0 mg L-1 day(-1)). The correlations between the dosage effect of chemical inducers and metabolites variation were further examined by statistical analyses. Additionally, C. zofingiensis-derived lipids were estimated to be more viable and feasible as edible oils based on fatty acid characteristics assessment. The present work highlights the effective screening strategy of chemical inducers for enhancing astaxanthin and lipid production and the potential application in mixotrophic C. zofingiensis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据