4.6 Article

Biodegradation of polystyrene by three bacterial strains isolated from the gut of Superworms (Zophobas atratus larvae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 132, 期 4, 页码 2823-2831

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/jam.15474

关键词

bacillus; biodegradation; Brevibacterium; polystyrene; pseudomonas; superworms

资金

  1. Srinakharinwirot University [024 /2563]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully isolated polystyrene-degrading bacteria from the gut of superworms and demonstrated their ability to degrade polystyrene. Brevibacterium sp. EDX was identified as the most efficient strain. This research is significant for the development of plastic remediation processes.
Aims To isolate polystyrene-degrading bacteria from the gut of superworms and investigate their ability to degrade polystyrene (PS). Methods and Results Three PS-degrading bacteria identified as Pseudomonas sp. EDB1, Bacillus sp. EDA4 and Brevibacterium sp. EDX were successfully isolated from the gut of superworms (Zophobas atratus Larvae) that ingest PS. Incubating PS with each strain for 30-day led to the formation of biofilm on the PS film. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed considerable damage (in terms of pits formation) on the surface of the PS films. FTIR analysis suggested the incorporation of carbonyl group into the carbon backbone of PS. Decreasing of WCA of microbial-treated PS film confirmed a chemical change from hydrophobicity to hydrophilicity on the PS surface. Based on these results, we conclude that all isolates had the ability to degrade PS. Conclusions Brevibacterium sp. EDX (GenBank MZ32399) was isolated as the most efficient PS-degrading strain based on the most changing in both PS surface morphology (SEM and WCA analyses) and chemical modification (FTIR analysis) in its PS degradation process. Significance and Impact of the Study This was the first study to describe the PS degradation by Brevibacterium sp. EDX, and thus provided for its development in the plastic remediation process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据