4.5 Article

In vitro synergistic activity of colistin and teicoplanin combination against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 181-184

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41429-022-00509-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF)
  2. Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the synergistic activity of colistin and teicoplanin combination against multidrug resistant Acinetobacter spp. The results showed that the combination exhibited synergistic and bactericidal effects against most tested isolates, indicating its potential therapeutic value.
Drug combinations may have a crucial role in treating infections due to multidrug resistant Acinetobacter spp. One suggested combination is colistin with teicoplanin. The effect of colistin on Acinetobacter spp. outer membrane can permit teicoplanin to its target in the cell wall. The aim of this study was to evaluate the synergistic activity of colistin and teicoplanin combination against 29 multidrug resistant isolates of Acinetobacter spp. The antimicrobial activity of colistin alone and in combination with teicoplanin was assessed using MIC and time-kill assays. The combination of 1 mg/l colistin and 10 mg/l teicoplanin showed in vitro synergism against all tested Acinetobacter isolates except one (Acinetobacter lowffii). The combination of 1 mg/l colistin and 10 mg/l teicoplanin was bactericidal at 6 h against 100% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates with no bacterial regrowth at 24 h. The same combination was bactericidal against three out of seven non-baumannii Acinetobacter isolates. The increased concentration of teicoplanin (20 mg/l) was synergistic but still not bactericidal against the four remaining isolates. The combination of colistin and teicoplanin was synergistic against all tested Acinetobacter spp It is therefore recommended that clinical trials are conducted to clarify the therapeutic potential of the combination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据