4.2 Article

Thermal Degradants Identified from the Vaping of Vitamin E Acetate

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 750-756

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkab109

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [DA-040460]
  3. RTI International internal research and development funds
  4. EVALI supplement [DA-044377]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have found that vitamin E acetate undergoes thermal degradation in electronic vaping devices and is considered a major contributor to e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injuries. By analyzing the degradation products of vitamin E acetate, researchers have identified two major compounds and suggested their potential as biomarkers for exposure and toxicity assessment.
Studies have suggested that vitamin E acetate (VEA), when used in an electronic vaping device, undergoes thermal degradation and is considered one of the main contributors in e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI). Using a Borgwaldt 5.1 linear smoker, a SVS250 Electronic Vaporizer and two types of tank systems, VEA was analyzed for degradation products produced via the Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco method 81 when the filter containing vaporized VEA was extracted using acetonitrile. Two of the major products identified were 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1,4-benzoquinone and 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-1-pentadecene, which were confirmed using analytical standards and gas chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS). Additional synthesis of 4-acetoxy-2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-2,4-cyclohexadienone and subsequent characterization using nuclear magnetic resonance and GC-HRMS suggested that this is not one of the products produced. Identification of these degradants will allow future studies to quantify and examine the degradants in vivo and in vitro as biomarkers for exposure and toxicity assessment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据