4.7 Article

Synthetic HZSM-5/MCM-41 catalyst by Direct Non-thermal Plasma for promoted production of aromatic hydrocarbons by catalytic pyrolysis of rape straw

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105365

关键词

Direct non-thermal plasma; Meso-micropore composite catalyst; Catalytic pyrolysis; Biomass; Aromatic hydrocarbons

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201420]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630495, 2019T120375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The direct non-thermal plasma (DNTP) system is an effective method for removing templates from composite catalysts and improving their physicochemical properties, thereby enhancing catalytic performance for monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
A method of template removal by direct non-thermal plasma (DNTP) system for the synthesis of HZSM-5/MCM41 meso-micropore composite catalyst was proposed for the production of aromatic hydrocarbons by catalytic pyrolysis of rape straw. It was revealed most of the template on the catalyst was removed by oxidizing substances such as ozone produced by DNTP. During DNTP treatment, the removal effect of the template was greatly affected by the oxygen flow rate. Also, the catalyst structure was bombarded by high-energy electrons obtained by DNTP treatment, and the physicochemical property of the synthetic composite catalysts was treated quite different from that obtained by calcination method. Under the treatment condition of 22 kV-2 L/min, the BET surface area was boosted significantly by 29.91% and the amount of acid sites was boosted by 37.71%, the yield of MAHs reached 10.57 wt%. Generally, not only the template can be effectively removed by DNTP treatment, but also the physicochemical property of meso-micropore composite catalyst can be improved, and thus promoted the catalytic performance for monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Therefore, DNTP is an effective technology for removing template and the catalytic performance can be efficiently improved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据