4.7 Article

Surface analysis of solid products of thermal treatment of lignocellulosic biomass

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105429

关键词

Pyrolysis; Hydrothermal carbonization; Torrefaction; Biochar; Hydrochar; Surface properties; Porosity; Electron microscopy; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Time-of-flight secondary ion mass; spectrometry Fourier-transform infrared; spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of surface properties of thermally treated lignocellulosic biomass is crucial for controlling the formation process and developing materials with unique properties. This study discussed the most useful methods, including microscopic techniques, nitrogen adsorption/desorption, infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, for analyzing the surface of biochars.
An analysis of surface properties of lignocellulosic biomass subjected to the thermal treatment is a very important task taking into account possibility of the industrial application of carbonaceous materials formed in the mentioned process. The knowledge of morphology and chemical composition of the surface of products of thermal decomposition of lignocellulosic feedstock allows for the control of their formation process and devel-opment of the materials with unique properties. That is why this work was focused on the presentation of the most useful methods of the analysis of the surface of solids formed in thermal processing of biomass. An application of microscopic techniques (SEM, TEM) for the analysis of morphology, nitrogen adsorption/ desorption method for the evaluation of porosity, infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) for assessment of oxygen-containing functional groups, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) for the determination of surface composition of the studied biochars was dis-cussed. The advantages and drawbacks of these methods were presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据