4.7 Article

Noncentrosymmetric chalcohalide K2Ba3Ge3S9Cl2: A new nonlinear optical material with remarkable laser-induced damage threshold

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 895, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162602

关键词

chalcohalide; crystal structure; second-harmonic generation; laser-induced damage threshold; theoretical calculation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771159, 22071212]
  2. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China, Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX21_3195]
  3. Foundation of Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Yangzhou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The newly synthesized chalcohalide K2Ba3Ge3S9Cl2 has a unique structure with a wide band gap and high laser-induced damage threshold, making it a potential excellent nonlinear optical material.
Chalcohalides are attractive infrared (IR) nonlinear optical (NLO) materials because they can take advantages of the large second-harmonic generation (SHG) responses of chalcogenides and high laser-induced damage thresholds (LIDTs) of halides simultaneously, which are two correlated while contradictory indicators of the NLO performance. Here, a new chalcohalide, K2Ba3Ge3S9Cl2, was synthesized by a high temperature solid-state reaction, and it crystallizes in the polar noncentrosymmetric space group P6(3). The fundamental structural unit [Ge3S9](6-) rings formed by three corner-sharing [GeS4](4-) tetrahedra construct the framework, which further connects with {[KS3Cl](-6)}(infinity) chains to build up the structure with Ba and K/Ba cations occupying the cavities. It exhibits a widest band gap of 3.69 eV among all Ba-based chalcohalides, and a high LIDT around 28.8 times that of AgGaS2. It exhibits a SHG intensity around 0.34 times that of AGS. These experimental results are verified by theoretical calculations on its electronic structure and optical properties. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据