4.7 Article

Porous-foam mullite-bonded SiC-ceramic membranes for high-efficiency high-temperature particulate matter capture

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 893, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162231

关键词

Foaming; Tape casting; SiC-ceramic membranes; High-temperature PM capture; Removal efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1732115, 11435012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports on the preparation of ceramic foam membranes with 3D interconnected pores and high PM filtration efficiency, achieved through direct foaming and gel-tape casting. The produced MSCMs contain large and small functional pores for efficient filtration of different particulate matters, with adjustable porosity and bending strength.
Membranes of ceramic foams exhibit excellent prospects for application in the field of high-temperature particulate matter (PM) capture. Production of ceramic membranes that can achieve good removal efficiency as well as low pressure drop in high-efficiency PM filtration represents a great challenge. This paper reports on the preparation of porous-foam mullite-bonded SiC-ceramic membranes (MSCMs) with a 3D interconnecting pore network by a direct foaming method combined with gel-tape casting. The produced MSCMs contained large pores with a diameter of 60-150 mu m, which were interconnected with abundant small functional (for filtering) pores of < 10 mu m. Increasing the amount of the foaming agent favored the increase of porosity of the MSCMs, which was tailored between 69.2% and 84.1%, while the bending strength decreased from 10.3 to 4.0 MPa, respectively. High PM filtration efficiency (70.2%, 90.1%, and 94.6% for PM0.3, PM2.5, and PM10, respectively) and ultra-low pressure drop (27 Pa) were also recorded. Hence, the produced MSCMs qualify for application as high-temperature PM filters. This work also aims at providing a new insight into developing high-efficiency air filters. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据