4.7 Article

The analyzing of I-V performance of PbO2/n-Si heterojunction in the wide temperature range

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 888, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161523

关键词

Lead oxide; Schttoky diode; Current-Voltage; Capacitance-Voltage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, lead oxide (PbO2) was used as an interface material in Schottky diode applications, and its morphological properties were analyzed. Reference diode and PbO2/n-Si heterojunctions were fabricated and the parameters were calculated. The experiment showed that the diode parameters were strongly temperature-dependent, and the diode capacitance decreased with increasing frequency.
In this study, lead oxide (PbO2) was used as interface material in Schottky diode applications. The morphological properties of PbO2 were analyzed by using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The n-Si crystal was used as the base material and PbO2 material was coated on the crystal with spin coating (1000 rpm for 3 min). Thus, reference diode and PbO2/n-Si heterojunctions were fabricated. The barrier height (Phi(b)) and ideality factor (n) values were calculated using room temperature current-voltage (I-V) characteristic of these diodes. These values were calculated as n = 1.24, Phi(b) = 0.84 for Ni/n-Si/Al diode and n = 1.91, Phi(b) = 0.77 for Ni/PbO2/n-Si/Al heterojunction. In addition, the n, Phi(b) and series resistance (R-s) values of the PbO2/n-Si diode were calculated for different temperature values (120-300 K). It was determined that the diode parameters were strongly dependent on the temperature. It was observed that the change in the Phi(b) and n values of the diode with temperature showed a double Gaussian distribution. Also, capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements for different frequency values of PbO2/n-Si heterojunction were analyzed at the 300 K. It was observed that the diode capacitance decreased with the increasing frequency. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据