4.7 Article

Grain size dependent deformation behavior of a metastable Fe40Co20Cr20Mn10Ni10 high-entropy alloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 883, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160876

关键词

Metastable high-entropy alloy; Grain size; Phase transformation; HCP lamellae

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971247]
  2. Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation [kq2014125]
  3. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy at Central South University, Changsha, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of grain size on deformation behavior in a metastable high-entropy alloy were investigated. Smaller grain size led to higher strain hardening rates at the original stage of deformation, but lower values at the later stage due to reduced martensite phase transformation.
The effects of grain size on the deformation behavior in a metastable Fe40Co20Cr20Mn10Ni10 high-entropy alloy (HEA) were investigated. The dislocation substructures with two different grain sizes of 12 mu m (FG) and 41 mu m (CG) upon straining were revealed, of which the strong grain size dependent of martensite phase transformation was observed. The HCP martensite plates appear earlier in the CG sample than the FG sample, along with the formation of much thicker and higher fraction of the HCP plates. This is ascribed to the impediment of stacking faults (SFs) movement and further the growth of the HCP lamellae from grain boundaries. The differences between the strain hardening behavior of the FG and CG HEAs were clarified in terms of the deformation microstructural evolution. The FG HEA shows higher strain hardening rates at original stage of deformation resulted from pinning effects to dislocation movements by grain boundaries, yet values of strain hardening rates are lower for the FG HEA at later stage of deformation due to the lower level of martensite phase transformation. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据