4.7 Article

Simulation-aided analysis on mechanical properties of dilute Mg-Zn-Ca alloy sheets

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 906, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164285

关键词

Magnesium alloys; Formability; Texture; Simulation; Parameter estimation

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP20K15067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between Zn content and room temperature mechanical properties of dilute Mg-xZn-0.1Ca alloy sheets was investigated. Increasing the Zn content resulted in a significant improvement in the formability. The relative activity of deformation modes did not show apparent differences between different Zn contents. The appearance of tilted basal poles and the development of TD-split texture contributed to the enhanced formability. The efficient scheme for parameter fitting required for VPSC simulation was proposed.
The relationship between Zn content and room temperature (RT) mechanical properties of dilute Mg-xZn-0.1Ca (x = 0.1, 0.2,0.3, 0.5, 1.5, 2.5 in wt%) alloy sheets was investigated. The index Erichsen (IE) value, an indicator of stretch formability, was found to increase significantly from 6.6 mm to 8.4 mm by increasing the Zn content from 0.2 wt% to 0.3 wt%. Visco-Plastic Self-Consistent (VPSC) simulation revealed there was no apparent difference in the relative activity of deformation modes in Mg-0.2Zn-0.1Ca and Mg-0.3Zn-0.1Ca alloys. On the other hand, electron back-scattered diffraction observation showed that a component having basal poles tilted towards the transverse direction (TD) began to appear when 0.3 wt% of Zn was added, and the typical TD-split texture was developed when the Zn content was increased to more than 1.5 wt%. Therefore, the rapid improvement of RT formability observed in this study can be attributed to the formation of TD-split texture. In addition to this, the efficient scheme for parameter fitting required to use VPSC simulation was also proposed in this study. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据