4.7 Article

Effect of Fe and Al on hydrogen storage properties of 75 V-Ti-Cr alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 887, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161181

关键词

Hydrogen storage; V-Ti alloy; BCT hydride; Plateau pressure; Cycle durability

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1502105]
  2. Youth Fund of GRINM Group Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

V-based hydrogen storage alloys are considered promising materials for high hydrogen capacity under ambient conditions. The addition of Fe or Al affects the hydrogen storage capacity and desorption plateau pressure. The relationship between lattice parameters, electron density, and hydrogen capacity is discussed. The optimized 75 V-Ti-15Cr-1Al-1Fe alloy shows high hydrogen storage capacity, pressure, and excellent cyclic performance.
V-based hydrogen storage alloys are considered promising materials with high hydrogen capacity under ambient conditions. 75 V-Ti-15Cr alloys with different Fe and Al addition (1-3 at%) have been investigated. All the alloys are confirmed to show body-centered tetragonal (BCT) structure after dehydrogenated at room temperature. The PCT tests manifest that the hydrogen storage capacity decreases and desorption plateau pressure rises with the content of Fe or Al. The relationship between the hydrogen storage property and lattice parameters of BCT phase is discussed. Also, the relationship between hydrogen capacity and electron density is analyzed. Among the studied alloys, the 75 V-Ti-15Cr-1Al-1Fe alloy shows optimal hydrogen storage capacity (2.26 wt%) and plateau pressure (0.5 MPa) at room temperature. Cycle test proves that the optimized 75 V-Ti-15Cr-1Al-1Fe alloy possesses excellent durability and the retention rate of hydrogen capacity can achieve 97% after 100 cycles. The slight capacity attenuation possibly results from the derivation of lattice defects and small contraction of the hydrogen absorption phases. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据