4.7 Article

Effect of martensite on {332} twinning formation in a metastable beta titanium alloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 895, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162598

关键词

Metastable beta Ti alloys; Phase stability; Twinning; Phase transformation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51671031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

{332}(beta) twinning and stress-induced martensite transformation are two important deformation mechanisms in metastable beta titanium alloys. By studying a model alloy, the correlation between {332}(beta) twinning and stress-induced martensite was revealed. The mechanism leads to a strong relationship between {332} twinning and stress-induced martensite in the alloy.
{332}(beta) twinning and stress-induced martensite transformation are two important deformation mechanisms in the metastable beta titanium alloys, which can effectively strengthen the titanium alloys via twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) and transformation induced martensite (TRIP) effect, respectively. For a TWIP + TRIP metastable beta titanium alloy, {332}(beta) twinning and stress-induced martensite can co-exist to improve the mechanical behaviors. However, the underlying mechanism for the co-existence of {332}(beta) twinning and stress-induced martensite is not clear. Here we employed a model metastable beta titanium alloy Ti-2Al-9.2Mo-2Fe (wt%) to reveal the correlation between {332}(beta) twinning and stress-induced martensite. The deformation gradient analysis and magnitude of shuffling needed for twining were utilized to reveal the relationship between {332} twinning and stress-induced martensite. As a result, we found that {332} twinning is a product of the reverse bcc to orthorhombic phase transformation. Such mechanism leads to a strong correlation between {332} twinning and stress-induced martensite, causing the {332} twinning combining stress-induced martensite in the present alloy. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据