4.7 Article

Identification of Compounds Contributing to Trigeminal Pungency of Baijiu by Sensory Evaluation, Quantitative Measurements, Correlation Analysis, and Sensory Verification Testing

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 598-606

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06875

关键词

trigeminal pungency; Baijiu; time-intensity; correlation analysis; sensory verification testing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32172331]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1604100]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018 M631971]
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Provence [KYCX18_1801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that esters are the main compounds contributing to the pungency of Baijiu, while aldehydes and acids have a lesser impact on pungency. This information provides a useful basis for improving the quality of distilled spirits in the future.
Pungency is one of the most important mouthfeel characteristics that is primarily related to the sensory quality of distilled spirits. However, the chemical basis of pungency is still unclear. A set of Baijiu samples with different levels of pungency was characterized by sensory analysis and volatile compound analyses. Several esters, aldehydes, and acids significantly correlated with pungency. Ethyl hexanoate, ethyl acetate, 3-methylbutyl hexanoate, acetaldehyde, acetal, and 3-methylbutanal were confirmed to be the strongest contributors to the pungency of Baijiu by the two-alternative forced-choice test. Sensory recombination testing further revealed that the contribution of esters to pungency was much higher than that of the aldehydes, and acid compounds at low concentrations suppress the pungency perception. In this study, the importance of esters in the pungency of distilled spirits is first reported. The results provide an instructive basis for further research into optimizing the quality of products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据