4.7 Article

Enantioselective Dissipation, Residue, and Risk Assessment of Diniconazole Enantiomers in Four Kinds of Fruits

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 51, 页码 15512-15520

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03852

关键词

chiral diniconazole; absolute configuration; SFC-MS/MS; enantioselective dissipation; risk assessment

资金

  1. Science Technology Project of Zhejiang Province [2020C02023]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1603004]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22006137]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ21C140002]
  5. project of State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agroproducts [2010DS700124-ZZ2001, 2010DS700124-ZZ2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new SFC-MS/MS method was developed to study the degradation characteristics and enantioselectivity of chiral diniconazole in four fruits, revealing preferential degradation of S-diniconazole.
Chiral diniconazole is a widely used triazole fungicide, while its enantioselective behaviors in fruits have not been reported. In this article, the absolute configuration was confirmed. A fast supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS) method was developed for the chiral separation and enantioselective study of diniconazole in four kinds of fruits. The residual concentrations gradually decreased with time in four kinds of fruits after applying diniconazole. The dissipation half-lives of R-diniconazole and S-diniconazole were in the range of 5.3-7.9 and 2.5-7.1 days respectively, and S-diniconazole was degraded preferentially. The residue concentrations were lower than the EU's MRL (0.01 mg/kg) on the 40th (harvest time), 30th, and 10th day in pear, jujube, and apple, respectively. But, in peach, residue concentrations were still higher than the MRL after 60 days and the ratio of R/S was 2.2. These results could be helpful for the reasonable use and risk assessment of chiral diniconazole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据