4.7 Article

Anti-hypertensive Peptide Predictor: A Machine Learning-Empowered Web Server for Prediction of Food-Derived Peptides with Potential Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-I Inhibitory Activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 49, 页码 14995-15004

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04555

关键词

angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE); bioactive peptides; anti-hypertensive activity; in silico proteolysis; machine learning; ACE-I inhibition

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India [DBT/2015/IIT-R/325]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The newly developed web server utilizes machine learning and structural bioinformatics to identify ACE-I inhibitory peptides from food sources through in silico digestion and screening of peptides, potentially enhancing efficiency and reducing cost.
Angiotensin converting enzyme-I (ACE-I) is a key therapeutic target of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), the central pathway of blood pressure regulation. Food-derived peptides with ACE-I inhibitory activities are receiving significant research attention. However, identification of ACE-I inhibitory peptides from different food proteins is a labor-intensive, lengthy, and expensive process. For successful identification of potential ACE-I inhibitory peptides from food sources, a machine learning and structural bioinformatics-based web server has been developed and reported in this study. The web server can take input in the FASTA format or through UniProt ID to perform the in silico gastrointestinal digestion and then screen the resulting peptides for ACE-I inhibitory activity. This unique platform provides elaborated structural and functional features of the active peptides and their interaction with ACE-I. Thus, it can potentially enhance the efficacy and reduce the time and cost in identifying and characterizing novel ACE-I inhibitory peptides from food proteins. URL: http://hazralab.iitr.ac.in/ahpp/index.php.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据