4.7 Article

Inhibition of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Fibrillation by Structurally Diverse Phenolic Compounds and Fibril Disaggregation Potential of Rutin and Quercetin

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 392-402

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06918

关键词

islet amyloid polypeptide; fibril formation; phenolic compounds; aggregation; disaggregation; structure-activity relationship

资金

  1. University Research Chairs Program of the University of Ottawa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of 12 food-derived phenolic compounds on islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) fibrillation was investigated. The results showed that gallic acid, caffeic acid, and rutin and its aglycone, quercetin, can inhibit IAPP fibrillation at specific ratios, and rutin and quercetin can change the structural features of IAPP.
The influence of 12 food-derived phenolic compounds on islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) fibrillation was investigated. Results from thioflavin T assay demonstrated that gallic acid, caffeic acid, and rutin and its aglycone, quercetin, inhibited IAPP fibrillation at 1:0.5, 1:1, and 1:2 IAPP-phenolic molar ratios. Circular dichroism and dynamic light scattering at the 1:1 IAPP-phenolic ratio confirmed the inhibition of fibril formation. Rutin and quercetin increased the lag time by 90 and 6%, and the relative alpha-helix content by 63 and 48%, respectively. Gallic acid decreased the elongation rate by 30%, whereas caffeic acid decreased the maximum fluorescence intensity by 65%. Furthermore, fluorescence microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed IAPP fibril morphologies indicative of fibrillation reduction by the compounds. Molecular docking and TEM showed that rutin and quercetin disaggregated preformed IAPP fibrils potentially through fibrillar-monomeric equilibrium shifts. These findings demonstrate important structural features of phenolic compounds for disaggregating IAPP fibrils or inhibiting their formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据