4.7 Review

Biorefinery of Green Biomass-How to Extract and Evaluate High Quality Leaf Protein for Food?

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 48, 页码 14341-14357

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04289

关键词

leaf protein; processing; food protein quality; nutritional value; functional properties

资金

  1. Center of Circular Bioeconomy, Aarhus University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the demand for protein continues to rise, exploring novel protein sources like leafy plant materials rich in enzymes such as RuBisCo is essential. Leafy crops can produce high protein yields sustainably in humid climates, and extracting protein from this green biomass for food use is the focus of green biorefinery methods.
There is a growing need for protein for both feed and food in order to meet future demands. It is imperative to explore and utilize novel protein sources such as protein from leafy plant material, which contains high amounts of the enzyme ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo). Leafy crops such as grasses and legumes can in humid climate produce high protein yields in a sustainable way when compared with many traditional seed protein crops. Despite this, very little RuBisCo is utilized for foods because proteins in the leaf material has a low accessibility to monogastrics. In order to utilize the leaf protein for food purposes, the protein needs to be extracted from the fiber rich leaf matrix. This conversion of green biomass to valuable products has been labeled green biorefinery. The green biorefinery may be tailored to produce different products, but in this Review, the focus is on production of food-grade protein. The existing knowledge on the extraction, purification, and concentration of protein from green biomass is reviewed. Additionally, the quality and potential application of the leaf protein in food products and side streams from the green biorefinery will be discussed along with possible uses of side streams from the protein production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据