4.1 Article

Contribution of Somatosensory and Parietal Association Areas in Improving Standing Postural Stability Through Standing Plantar Perception Training in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 761-770

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/japa.2020-0130

关键词

cortical activation; near-infrared spectroscopy; plantar sensation; standing balance

资金

  1. Osaka Gas Group Welfare Foundation
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [19K08016]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K08016] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that standing plantar perception training (SPPT) can improve standing postural stability in older adults by enhancing regional cortical activity, particularly in the right parietal association area.
Although standing plantar perception training (SPPT) may improve standing postural stability, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. The authors investigated the relationship between regional cortical responses to SPPT using a balance pad and training outcomes in 32 older participants (mean +/- SD:72.2 +/- 6.0, range:60-87). Regional cortical activity was measured in the bilateral supplementary motor area, primary sensorimotor area, and parietal association area using near-infrared spectroscopy. Postural sway changes were compared before and after SPPT. Changes in two-point plantar discrimination and regional cortical activity during SPPT, associated with standing postural stability improvements, were examined using multiple regression and indicated improved standing postural stability after SPPT (p <.0001). Changes in right parietal association area activity were associated with standing postural stability improvements while barefoot. Overall, the results suggest that right parietal association area activation during SPPT plays a crucial role in regulating standing postural stability and may help develop strategies to prevent older adults from falling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据