4.7 Review

Primary prevention of depression: An umbrella review of controlled interventions

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 294, 期 -, 页码 957-970

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.101

关键词

Depression; Prevention; Evidence; Prediction; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. European College of Neuro-psychopharmacology Network Taskforce
  2. Alicia Koplowitz Foundation
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universties
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  5. European Regional Development Fund A way of making Europe
  6. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red Salud Mental
  7. Madrid Regional Government
  8. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to analyze systematic meta-reviews on primary prevention of depression. Results indicated moderate credibility in psychosocial interventions for reducing depressive symptoms in young adults, while preventive administration of SSRIs for depressive disorders in individuals with a stroke showed high credibility.
Background: Primary prevention has the potential to modify the course of depression, but the consistency and magnitude of this effect are currently undetermined. Methods: PRISMA and RIGHT compliant (PROSPERO:CRD42020179659) systematic meta-review, PubMed/ Web of Science, up to June 2020. Meta-analyses of controlled interventions for the primary prevention of depressive symptoms [effect measures: standardized mean difference (SMD)] or depressive disorders [effect measure: relative risk (RR)] were carried out. Results were stratified by: (i) age range; (ii) target population (general and/or at-risk); (iii) intervention type. Quality (assessed with AMSTAR/AMSTAR-PLUS content) and credibility (graded as high/moderate/low) were assessed. USPSTF grading system was used for recommendations. Results: Forty-six meta-analyses (k=928 individual studies, n=286,429 individuals, mean age=22.4 years, 81.1% female) were included. Effect sizes were: SMD=0.08-0.53; for depressive symptoms; RR=0.90-0.28 for depressive disorders. Sensitivity analyses including only RCTs did not impact the findings. AMSTAR median=9 (IQR=8-9); AMSTAR-PLUS content median=4.25 (IQR=4-5). Credibility of the evidence was insufficient/low in 43 (93.5%) meta-analyses, moderate in two (4.3%), and high in one (2.2%): reduction of depressive symptoms using psychosocial interventions for young adults only, and a combination of psychological and educational interventions in primary care had moderate credibility; preventive administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depressive disorders in individuals with a stroke had high credibility. Limitations: Intervention heterogeneity and lack of long-term efficacy evaluation. Conclusions: Primary preventive interventions for depression might be effective. Among them, clinicians may offer SSRIs post-stroke to prevent depressive disorders, and psychosocial interventions for children/adolescents/ young adults with risk factors or during the prenatal/perinatal period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据