4.3 Article

Optimal Lung Cancer Screening Criteria Among Persons Living With HIV

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002930

关键词

lung cancer; HIV; AIDS; lung cancer screening

资金

  1. Program in Multidisciplinary Training in Pulmonary Diseases at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [T32-HL007106]
  2. National Institutes of Health [K24 HL087713]
  3. Merck
  4. Gilead
  5. Viiv
  6. Atlanta CRS [U01-HL146241]
  7. Baltimore CRS [U01-HL146201]
  8. Bronx CRS [U01-HL146204]
  9. Brooklyn CRS [U01-HL146202]
  10. Data Analysis and Coordination Center [U01-HL146193]
  11. Chicago-Cook County CRS [U01-HL146245]
  12. Chicago-Northwestern CRS [U01-HL146240]
  13. Northern California CRS [U01-HL146242]
  14. Los Angeles CRS [U01-HL146333]
  15. Metropolitan Washington CRS [U01-HL146205]
  16. Miami CRS [U01-HL146203]
  17. Pittsburgh CRS [U01-HL146208]
  18. UAB-MS CRS [U01-HL146192]
  19. UNC CRS [U01-HL146194]
  20. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  21. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
  22. National Institute On Aging (NIA)
  23. National Institute Of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
  24. National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  25. National Institute Of Neurological Disorders And Stroke (NINDS)
  26. National Institute Of Mental Health (NIMH)
  27. National Institute On Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  28. National Institute Of Nursing Research (NINR)
  29. National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  30. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
  31. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
  32. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  33. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
  34. National Institutes of Health, Office of AIDS Research (OAR)
  35. UCSF CTSA [UL1-TR000004]
  36. JHU ICTR [UL1TR003098]
  37. UCLA CTSI [UL1-TR001881]
  38. Atlanta CFAR [P30-AI-050409]
  39. Miami CFAR [P30-AI-073961]
  40. UNC CFAR [P30-AI-050410]
  41. UAB CFAR [P30-AI-027767]
  42. Miami CHARM [P30-MH-116867]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the screening criteria for patients with HIV, and found that the new 2021 criteria improved the sensitivity of lung cancer screening in this population. Additionally, lowering the age and tobacco exposure thresholds further increased the screening sensitivity in women. Further research is needed to determine the optimal screening criteria for patients with HIV, particularly in women.
Background: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 updated recommendations on lung cancer screening with chest computed tomography to apply to individuals 50-80 years of age (previously 55-80 years), with a >= 20 pack-year history (previously >= 30), whether currently smoking or quit <= 15 years ago. Despite being at higher risk for lung cancer, persons with HIV (PWH) were not well-represented in the National Lung Screening Trial, which informed the USPSTF 2013 recommendations. It is unknown or unclear how PWH are affected by the 2021 recommendations. Setting: This study was a retrospective analysis of PWH with and without lung cancer in the Women's Interagency HIV Study and the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Methods: We identified PWH, ages 40-80 years, who currently or previously smoked, with (cases) and without lung cancer (noncases). The sensitivity and specificity of the old, new, and alternative screening criteria were evaluated in each cohort. Results: We identified 52 women and 19 men with lung cancer and 1950 women and 1599 men without lung cancer. Only 11 women (22%) and 6 men (32%) with lung cancer met 2013 screening criteria; however, more women (22; 44%) and men (12; 63%) met 2021 criteria. Decreased age and tobacco exposure thresholds in women further increased sensitivity of the 2021 criteria. Conclusions: The 2021 USPSTF lung cancer screening recommendations would have resulted in more PWH with lung cancer being eligible for screening at the time of their diagnosis. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal screening criteria for PWH, particularly in women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据