4.7 Article

Precoding Design for Distributed Antenna Systems in Spatially Correlated Ricean Fading Channel

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 65, 期 11, 页码 9138-9152

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2016.2519911

关键词

Distributed antenna systems (DAS); precoder design; Ricean channel; spatial correlation; statistical channel state information

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61172077, 61201208, 61571225]
  2. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu [DZXX-007]
  4. CityU [7004435]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three precoding schemes that are based on statistical channel state information ( CSI) for distributed antenna systems ( DAS) in spatially correlated channels are presented. The first two schemes exploit the channel correlation at the transmitter and the eigenstructure of the precoder to develop efficient algorithms to obtain its beamforming matrix and power allocation ( PA). Based on the analysis of an average pairwise error probability bound at a low signal-to-noise ratio ( SNR), the first scheme derives a suboptimal unitary matrix that helps develop an efficient modified power adaptation. The scheme has low computational complexity but encounters slight performance loss in moderate- and high-SNR regions. To reduce the performance loss, the unitary matrix is reoptimized by using the Riemannian steepest descent method in the second scheme. With the unitary matrix and modified PA, a suboptimal precoder is obtained. Using the first precoding scheme, a low-complexity precoder design is developed for Rayleigh channels, which has closed-form power control in the form of a waterfilling rule. Compared with the existing precoding scheme that relies on a fixed-point numerical search, the proposed schemes have lower complexity. Simulation results show that the proposed schemes can provide symbol error performance better than the equal-PA scheme and close to the existing precoding scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据