4.5 Article

A green phenolic resin/needle coke scrap-based carbon/carbon composite as anode material for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

IONICS
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 5079-5087

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-021-04278-5

关键词

Anode materials; Lithium-ion battery; Needle coke scrap; Phenolic resin; Carbon; carbon composite

资金

  1. Scientific and Technical Project of Sichuan Province [2019YJ0479, 2019YFG0072]
  2. Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project of Sichuan University of Science and Engineering [D10501270]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51764017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, carbon/carbon composite was prepared using phenolic resin as a binder to recycle ultrafine needle coke scrap, showing promising microstructure characteristics and electrochemical performance. The carbon/carbon composite exhibited comparable particle size to commercial needle coke and demonstrated high discharge capacity and coulombic efficiency as an anode material for LIBs.
In this work, phenolic resin served as binder to recycle ultrafine needle coke scrap, and then carbon/carbon composite was prepared through high-temperature graphitization. The influences of phenolic resin content on the microstructure characteristics of carbon/carbon composite were investigated by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, laser particle size, and nitrogen adsorption-desorption. When the mass ratio of ultrafine needle coke scrap to phenolic resin is 1:2, the carbon/carbon composite shows an average particle size of 19.17 mu m, which is higher than that of ultrafine needle coke scrap (3 mu m) and is close to that of commercial needle coke (19.12 mu m). Moreover, the carbon/carbon composite as anode material for LIBs exhibits the 1st and 50th discharge capacity of 360.8 mAh/g and 352.6 mAh/g. Additionally, its coulombic efficiency after 50th cycles is over 99%. In principle, the synthesized carbon/carbon composite exhibits a comparable electrochemical performance to commercial needle coke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据