4.7 Article

Multi-group consensus for heterogeneous agents in cooperative-competitive networks via pinning and adaptive coupling weight methods

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE
卷 53, 期 7, 页码 1469-1482

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2021.2010831

关键词

Multi-group consensus; adaptive coupling weight; cooperative-competitive relationship; Markov switching topology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61876200, 62072066, 62006031]
  2. Major Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJZD-M202100602]
  3. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2018jcyjAX0112, cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0545]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the multi-group consensus problem for heterogeneous networks using pinning control and adaptive coupling weight methods. The results indicate that the in-degree of the agents and pinning gains are closely related to achieving consensus, and the adaptive coupling weight method can increase the convergence rate of the network. Simulation experiments verify the theoretical results.
This paper investigates the multi-group consensus problem for heterogeneous networks via pinning control and adaptive coupling weight methods. In view of the network's topology with connected components, the cooperative-competitive interactions among the agents and Markov switching topology are considered. Based on Lyapunov stability theory and algebraic graph theory, several sufficient conditions and pinning control strategies are presented to guarantee the network reach multi-group consensus. The results reveal that the in-degree of the agents and pinning gains of the second-order agents are closely related to the achievement of multi-group consensus. Finally, simulation experiments are given to verify the correctness of the theoretical results. Moreover, the simulated results show that the adaptive coupling weight method can increase the convergence rate of the network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据