Peer Presence Increases Session Ratings of Perceived Exertion

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effect of peer presence on session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses. output 330 (44) W, completed an incremental cycling test and 3 identical experimental sessions, in groups of 4 or 5. Experimental sessions involved 24 minutes of cycling, whereby the work rate alternated between 40% and 70% peak power output every 3 minutes. During cycling, heart rate was collected every 3 minutes, and session-RPE was recorded 10 minutes after cycling, in 3 communication contexts: in written form unaccompanied (intrapersonal communication), verbally by the researcher only (interpersonal communication), and in the presence of the training group. Session-RPE was analyzed using ordinal regression and heart rate using a linear mixed-effects model, with models fit in a Bayesian framework. Results: Session-RPE was voted higher when collected in the group's presence compared with when written (odds ratio = 4.26, 95% credible interval = 1.27-14.73). On average, the posterior probability that session-RPE was higher in the group setting than when written was .53. Session-RPE was not different between the group and verbal, or verbal and written collection contexts. Conclusions: This study suggests that contextual psychosocial inputs influence session-RPE and highlights the importance of session-RPE users controlling the measurement environment when collecting votes.

Automated summary

This study aimed to examine the effect of peer presence on session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses. The results showed that session-RPE was rated higher when collected in the group's presence compared with when written, and there was no difference in session-RPE between verbal and written collection contexts. This suggests that contextual psychosocial inputs influence session-RPE.