4.4 Article

Neuromuscular Performance and Training Workload Over an In-Season Mesocycle in Elite Young Soccer Players

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0834

关键词

training load; strength; evoked

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the neuromuscular performance capabilities of early career professional soccer players over an in-season mesocycle and examine the relationship with training workload. The results showed fluctuations in neuromuscular performance capabilities and their association with high-intensity running workload. The findings highlight the importance of acute monitoring for elite soccer players.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess neuromuscular performance capabilities over an in-season mesocycle in earlycareer professional soccer players and examine the relationship with training workload. Methods: Neuromuscular performance capabilities (isometric knee extensor: peak force, rate of force development, and peak twitch force) of 12 professional soccer players were assessed weekly over a 6-week period. Training and match workload were also recorded over the same period for each player (high-intensity running distance). Changes in neuromuscular performance and workload variables were analyzed. Results: There was evidence of fluctuations in neuromuscular performance capability over the mesocycle that reached statistical (P < .05) and practical (13.3% [peak-to-peak]) significance alongside interweek heterogeneity in training and match workload (similar to 17.5% [coefficient of variation], P < .05). Congruence among fluctuating patterns of intramesocycle training load and concomitant neuromuscular performance responses was noted over time for acute training load and acute:chronic workload ratio with peak force and rate of force development. Conclusion: Neuromuscular performance capabilities fluctuate over an inseason mesocycle and are influenced by high-intensity running workload, emphasizing the need for acute monitoring in elite soccer players.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据