4.6 Article

The effect of T-stress on mixed mode I/II fracture of composite materials: Reinforcement isotropic solid model in combination with maximum shear stress theory

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111145

关键词

Fracture criterion; Mixed mode loading; Composite materials; Maximum shear stress criterion; Reinforcement isotropic solid; T-Stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new mixed mode I/II fracture criterion is proposed in this research, combining MSS theory and RIS concept for fracture investigation of orthotropic materials. RIS, based on the fact that cracks generally propagate along fibers, accurately predicts crack initiation and propagation direction.
Due to the existence of cracks and defects in composite materials during the manufacturing process, damage and crack growth in these materials must be anticipated before application. In the present research, an efficient theoretical mixed mode I/II fracture criterion is proposed for fracture investigation of orthotropic materials considering the effects of non-singular stress term in William's series expansion. This criterion is developed combining the maximum shear stress (MSS) theory with reinforcement isotropic solid concept (RIS) as a superior material model. RIS is based on the fact that cracks in orthotropic materials generally propagate along the fibers in the isotropic matrix media regardless of initial crack fiber orientation. According to this fact, RIS offers to employ an isotropic stress field around the crack tip with defined stress reduction coefficients as fiber effects. This criterion is applicable for two cases wherein crack is placed both along and across the fibers. A comparison between available experimental data for two wood species and the results of the proposed criterion shows that this criterion can accurately predict both crack initiation and crack propagation direction and is in full compliance with the fracture nature of composite materials. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据