4.7 Article

Ethical fashion supply chain operations: product development and moral hazards

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 1058-1075

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2025943

关键词

Supply chain management; product greenness level; technologies; corporate social responsibility (CSR); product development; socially responsible operations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corporate social responsibility is crucial for fashion companies, and they need to consider ethics in product development. Using game theory modeling analysis, we identify key factors that influence optimal decisions in fashion product development. We also propose practical measures to encourage ethical operations and discuss potential moral hazard problems.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is critical. As a part of CSR, fashion companies have to decide whether to be ethical or not during the product development process. Motivated by real-world practices, we conduct a gametheoretic modeling analysis and derive the firms' optimal decisions (including ethical operations (ETO) adoption, pricing, and product greenness level) in fashion product development. We identify a key moderating factor which governs how an increase of basic market demand significantly affects the optimal product greenness level and how an increase of basic production cost influences the optimal retail price. Furthermore, we find that there is a threshold that plays a critical role in determining whether the optimal retail price and product greenness level are higher or lower with the adoption of ETO. We prove that when the fixed payment from the retailer to the manufacturer under the ETO case is set to be sufficiently small, the retailer prefers to adopt ETO and requests the manufacturer to follow. We propose three practical measures (including the use of technologies) to help encourage the supply chain members to invest in ETO willingly. We finally consider the probable occurrence of moral hazard problems and explore the managerial implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据