4.6 Article

Firm competitiveness: A general model and a manufacturing application

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108316

关键词

Firm competitiveness; RBV; Production; Capabilities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to connect strategic management and operations by proposing the concept of Firm Competitiveness Index (FCI) based on the resource-based view of the firm. The study finds a positive impact of dynamic production capabilities on firm competitiveness, while no significant relationship is found between ordinary production capabilities and firm-level competitiveness.
Competitiveness of firms is studied mostly from a strategic management perspective. It is only rarely a subject of analysis from the viewpoint of operations. In this paper, we aim to connect these two approaches using the resource-based view of the firm, popularly called RBV theories. First, we provide a comprehensive definition of firm competitiveness and propose a conceptual index (Firm Competitiveness Index or FCI) to measure it, based on the theory of dynamic capabilities. Further, we demonstrate the use of the FCI concept, with an application to the Hungarian manufacturing sector, utilizing survey responses from a sample of 113 firms collected as part of an ongoing research project focusing on competitiveness of the Hungarian industry. We employ exploratory- and confirmatory factor analysis to construct a context-specific FCI indicator on this sample. Finally, we explore the relationship between the constructed FCI, and thus a concept of competitiveness, and capabilities of the production area. Hierarchical regression analysis is employed to investigate this relationship. We posit this as a means to empirically test the perceived contribution of functional areas to the overall firm-level competitiveness. We find a positive impact of the dynamic production capabilities on the firm's perceived competitiveness but find no significant relationship between ordinary production capabilities and firm-level competitiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据