4.5 Article

Nonlinear vibration analysis of a cantilever beam with multiple breathing edge cracks

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2021.103774

关键词

Nonlinear vibration analysis; Multi-cracked beam; Breathing behavior; Bilinear behavior; Crack detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the nonlinear vibration behavior of a cantilever beam with multiple breathing cracks, with calculations of stiffness, evaluation of damping variation, and simulation of bilinear behavior using a polynomial function. Results show that beams with a higher number of cracks or deeper ones exhibit obvious softening behavior, leading to a more significant jumping in the response.
The nonlinear vibration analysis of cracked structures could be a suitable indicator for diagnosing defects. When breathing cracks appear on the beam, its behavior can be modeled as a bilinear oscillator. In this paper, the nonlinear vibration behavior of a cantilever beam with multiple breathing cracks is investigated. For this purpose, the multi-cracked beam's stiffness is calculated by introducing the effective length for the local stiffness reduction in the vicinity of cracks. Furthermore, owing to the importance of the damping variation in a cracked beam, its exact value is evaluated through theoretical expressions. A continuous polynomial function with the Weierstrass approximation is exploited to simulate the bilinear behavior of breathing cracks. By per -forming nonlinear analysis using the perturbation technique, the cracked beam's dynamic behavior is studied. Moreover, the sensitivity of the response to the crack parameters in the primary resonance of the structure is analyzed. Finally, the sensitivity of the beam's nonlinear response to the different number of breathing cracks and various crack depths is investigated. It is shown that the beam with a higher number of cracks or deeper ones has obvious softening behavior, and hence a more significant jumping can appear in the response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据