4.7 Review

Circulating Nucleic Acid-Based Biomarkers of Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23010295

关键词

biomarkers; genomics; transcriptomics; epigenomics; type 2 diabetes; nucleic acid

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [754432]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent studies on biomarkers for type 2 diabetes (T2D) based on circulating nucleic acids using genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic technologies. Several candidate biomarkers have been identified for the risk and diagnosis of T2D, the prognosis of T2D complications, and the pharmacodynamics of T2D treatments. Further validation in larger samples and non-invasive samples is needed to support the realization of precision medicine for T2D.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a deficiency in how the body regulates glucose. Uncontrolled T2D will result in chronic high blood sugar levels, eventually resulting in T2D complications. These complications, such as kidney, eye, and nerve damage, are even harder to treat. Identifying individuals at high risk of developing T2D and its complications is essential for early prevention and treatment. Numerous studies have been done to identify biomarkers for T2D diagnosis and prognosis. This review focuses on recent T2D biomarker studies based on circulating nucleic acids using different omics technologies: genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics. Omics studies have profiled biomarker candidates from blood, urine, and other non-invasive samples. Despite methodological differences, several candidate biomarkers were reported for the risk and diagnosis of T2D, the prognosis of T2D complications, and pharmacodynamics of T2D treatments. Future studies should be done to validate the findings in larger samples and blood-based biomarkers in non-invasive samples to support the realization of precision medicine for T2D.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据