4.7 Review

Potential Biomarkers Associated with Multiple Sclerosis Pathology

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910323

关键词

biomarkers; predictive; diagnostic; prognosis; treatment response monitoring; multiple sclerosis

资金

  1. Health Institute Carlos III [PI20/01446]
  2. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with heterogeneous clinical subtypes, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. Biomarkers play a crucial role in simplifying diagnosis and prognosis, as well as evaluating treatment outcomes in different clinical courses of MS.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that involves an intricate and aberrant interaction of immune cells leading to inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration. Due to the heterogeneity of clinical subtypes, their diagnosis becomes challenging and the best treatment cannot be easily provided to patients. Biomarkers have been used to simplify the diagnosis and prognosis of MS, as well as to evaluate the results of clinical treatments. In recent years, research on biomarkers has advanced rapidly due to their ability to be easily and promptly measured, their specificity, and their reproducibility. Biomarkers are classified into several categories depending on whether they address personal or predictive susceptibility, diagnosis, prognosis, disease activity, or response to treatment in different clinical courses of MS. The identified members indicate a variety of pathological processes of MS, such as neuroaxonal damage, gliosis, demyelination, progression of disability, and remyelination, among others. The present review analyzes biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood serum, the most promising imaging biomarkers used in clinical practice. Furthermore, it aims to shed light on the criteria and challenges that a biomarker must face to be considered as a standard in daily clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据