4.7 Article

Selenium and the 15kDa Selenoprotein Impact Colorectal Tumorigenesis by Modulating Intestinal Barrier Integrity

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910651

关键词

Selenof; selenium; selenoprotein; colon cancer; inflammation; barrier integrity

资金

  1. National Institutes of Healths Office of Dietary Supplements
  2. Towson Universitys Fisher College of Science Mathematics
  3. Office of Graduate studies
  4. National Cancer Institute
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. Towson Universitys Department of Biological Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that Selenof may play a significant role in the development of colon tumors, affecting intestinal barrier integrity and the structural changes in glandular and mucin-producing goblet cells.
Selenoproteins play important roles in many cellular functions and biochemical pathways in mammals. Our previous study showed that the deficiency of the 15 kDa selenoprotein (Selenof) significantly reduced the formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in a mouse model of azoxymethane (AOM)-induced colon carcinogenesis. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of Selenof on inflammatory tumorigenesis, and whether dietary selenium modified these effects. For 20 weeks post-weaning, Selenof-knockout (KO) mice and littermate controls were fed diets that were either deficient, adequate or high in sodium selenite. Colon tumors were induced with AOM and dextran sulfate sodium. Surprisingly, KO mice had drastically fewer ACF but developed a similar number of tumors as their littermate controls. Expression of genes important in inflammatory colorectal cancer and those relevant to epithelial barrier function was assessed, in addition to structural differences via tissue histology. Our findings point to Selenof's potential role in intestinal barrier integrity and structural changes in glandular and mucin-producing goblet cells in the mucosa and submucosa, which may determine the type of tumor developing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据