4.7 Review

Regulation of Hedgehog Signal Transduction by Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413338

关键词

hedgehog; Ptc; Ptch1; Smo; Ci; Gli; ubiquitination; deubiquitination; E3; DUB

资金

  1. NIGMS [GM118063]
  2. Welch Foundation [I-1603]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271531, 31771615, 32070801]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [090314380019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway plays a crucial role in regulating embryonic development and tissue homeostasis across species, and its activity is regulated by ubiquitination and deubiquitination of pathway components. The E3 ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases involved in this process and the conservation of underlying mechanisms from Drosophila to mammals are important factors to consider in understanding the Hh pathway.
The Hedgehog (Hh) family of secreted proteins governs embryonic development and adult tissue homeostasis in species ranging from insects to mammals. Deregulation of Hh pathway activity has been implicated in a wide range of human disorders, including congenital diseases and cancer. Hh exerts its biological influence through a conserved signaling pathway. Binding of Hh to its receptor Patched (Ptc), a twelve-span transmembrane protein, leads to activation of an atypical GPCR family protein and Hh signal transducer Smoothened (Smo), which then signals downstream to activate the latent Cubitus interruptus (Ci)/Gli family of transcription factors. Hh signal transduction is regulated by ubiquitination and deubiquitination at multiple steps along the pathway including regulation of Ptc, Smo and Ci/Gli proteins. Here we review the effect of ubiquitination and deubiquitination on the function of individual Hh pathway components, the E3 ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases involved, how ubiquitination and deubiquitination are regulated, and whether the underlying mechanisms are conserved from Drosophila to mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据