4.7 Article

A Transcriptome Analysis of mRNAs and Long Non-Coding RNAs in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031535

关键词

mRNAs; long non-coding RNAs; RNA sequencing; transcriptome analysis; Parkinson's disease; inverse comorbidity

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RC-2764019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder and is expected to double in cases by 2030. This study found that mitochondria and long non-coding RNA play important roles in Parkinson's disease and supports the concept of inverse comorbidity with certain cancers.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. The number of cases of PD is expected to double by 2030, representing a heavy burden on the healthcare system. Clinical symptoms include the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the midbrain, which leads to striatal dopamine deficiency and, subsequently, causes motor dysfunction. Certainly, the study of the transcriptome of the various RNAs plays a crucial role in the study of this neurodegenerative disease. In fact, the aim of this study was to evaluate the transcriptome in a cohort of subjects with PD compared with a control cohort. In particular we focused on mRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA), using the Illumina NextSeq 550 DX System. Differential expression analysis revealed 716 transcripts with padj <= 0.05; among these, 630 were mRNA (coding protein), lncRNA, and MT_tRNA. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA, Qiagen) was used to perform the functional and pathway analysis. The highest statistically significant pathways were: IL-15 signaling, B cell receptor signaling, systemic lupus erythematosus in B cell signaling pathway, communication between innate and adaptive immune cells, and melatonin degradation II. Our findings further reinforce the important roles of mitochondria and lncRNA in PD and, in parallel, further support the concept of inverse comorbidity between PD and some cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据