4.7 Review

Genetic Testing in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910401

关键词

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; genetics; molecular genetic testing; pathogenic mutations; variants of uncertain significance; next-generation sequencing

资金

  1. Conceptual Development of Research Organization, Motol University Hospital, Prague [00064203]
  2. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [15-34904A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited heart disease with complex genetic basis involving mutations in multiple genes. Patients without pathogenic variants are now believed to have non-Mendelian HCM and may have a better prognosis. Identifying the genetic basis of HCM provides opportunities for understanding disease development and potential interventions.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited heart disease with an estimated prevalence of up to 1 in 200 individuals. In the majority of cases, HCM is considered a Mendelian disease, with mainly autosomal dominant inheritance. Most pathogenic variants are usually detected in genes for sarcomeric proteins. Nowadays, the genetic basis of HCM is believed to be rather complex. Thousands of mutations in more than 60 genes have been described in association with HCM. Nevertheless, screening large numbers of genes results in the identification of many genetic variants of uncertain significance and makes the interpretation of the results difficult. Patients lacking a pathogenic variant are now believed to have non-Mendelian HCM and probably have a better prognosis than patients with sarcomeric pathogenic mutations. Identifying the genetic basis of HCM creates remarkable opportunities to understand how the disease develops, and by extension, how to disrupt the disease progression in the future. The aim of this review is to discuss the brief history and recent advances in the genetics of HCM and the application of molecular genetic testing into common clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据