4.7 Article

DOPA Homeostasis by Dopamine: A Control-Theoretic View

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222312862

关键词

dopamine; DOPA; tyrosine; homeostasis; metabolic channeling; robust control; integral feedback; derepression; tyrosine hydroxylase; neurotransmitter; vesicles; mathematical modeling; zero-order kinetics; oxidative stress; Parkinson's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dopamine plays a crucial role as a signal mediator in the brain and periphery, with abnormalities in dopamine levels linked to various neuropsychiatric disorders. Research suggests that a negative feedback loop involving tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine helps maintain DOPA homeostasis by using DA as a derepression regulator.
Dopamine (DA) is an important signal mediator in the brain as well as in the periphery. The term dopamine homeostasis occasionally found in the literature refers to the fact that abnormal DA levels can be associated with a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. An analysis of the negative feedback inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) by DA indicates, with support from the experimental data, that the TH-DA negative feedback loop has developed to exhibit 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) homeostasis by using DA as a derepression regulator. DA levels generally decline when DOPA is removed, for example, by increased oxidative stress. Robust DOPA regulation by DA further implies that maximum vesicular DA levels are established, which appear necessary for a reliable translation of neural activity into a corresponding chemical transmitter signal. An uncontrolled continuous rise (windup) in DA occurs when Levodopa treatment exceeds a critical dose. Increased oxidative stress leads to the successive breakdown of DOPA homeostasis and to a corresponding reduction in DA levels. To keep DOPA regulation robust, the vesicular DA loading requires close to zero-order kinetics combined with a sufficiently high compensatory flux provided by TH. The protection of DOPA and DA due to a channeling complex is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据