4.7 Article

Cationic Peptides and Their Cu(II) and Ni(II) Complexes: Coordination and Biological Characteristics

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222112028

关键词

cationic peptides; Cu(II) complexes; Ni(II) complexes; anti-inflammatory; potentiometric titration; spectroscopic methods; LPS-neutralization

资金

  1. Wroclaw Medical University [STM.D080.20.2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial peptides are promising compounds for infection treatment. Metal ions play a crucial role in activating these peptides. This study focused on new pseudopeptides and their coordination behavior with Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions, showing potential biological activity and metal ion-binding capabilities. The cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory activities of these compounds and their complexes were evaluated, indicating promising results.
Antimicrobial peptides are a promising group of compounds used for the treatment of infections. In some cases, metal ions are essential to activate these molecules. Examples of metalloantibiotics are, for instance, bleomycin and dermcidin. This study is focused on three new pseudopeptides with potential biological activity. The coordination behavior of all ligands with Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions has been examined. Various analytical methods such as potentiometric titration, UV-Vis and CD spectroscopies, and mass spectrometry were used. All compounds are convenient chelators for metal ion-binding. Two of the ligands tested have histidine residues. Surprisingly, imidazole nitrogen is not involved in the coordination of the metal ion. The N-terminal amino group, Dab side chains, and amide nitrogen atoms of the peptide bonds coordinated Cu(II) and Ni(II) in all the complexes formed. The cytotoxicity of three pseudopeptides and their complexes was evaluated. Moreover, their other model allowed for assessing the attenuation of LPS-induced cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory activities were also evaluated, the results of which revealed to be very promising.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据