4.7 Article

Iterative Methods for Subspace and DOA Estimation in Nonuniform Noise

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 3008-3020

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2016.2537265

关键词

Array signal processing; direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation; maximum-likelihood (ML) estimation; least-squares (LS) estimation; nonuniform noise

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61401284, 61471365, 61271420]
  2. Foundation of Shenzhen [JCYJ20140418091413566]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of SZU [201414, 201556, 827-000071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Usually, direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimators are derived under the assumption of uniform white noise, whose co-variance matrix is a scaled identity matrix. However, in practice, the noise can be nonuniform with an arbitrary unknown diagonal covariance matrix. In this situation, the performance of DOA estimators may be deteriorated considerably if the noise nonuniformity is ignored. To tackle this problem, iterative approaches to subspace estimation are developed and the corresponding subspace-based DOA estimators are addressed. In our proposed methods, the signal subspace and noise covariance matrix are first determined by maximizing the log-likelihood (LL) function or solving a least-squares (LS) minimization problem, both of which are accomplished in an iterative manner. Then, the DOAs are determined from the subspace estimate and/or noise covariance matrix estimate with the help of traditional DOA estimators. As the signal subspace and noise covariance matrix can be computed in closed-form in each iteration, the proposals are computationally attractive. Furthermore, the signal subspace is directly calculated without the requirement of the exact knowledge of the array manifold, enabling us to handle array uncertainties by incorporating conventional subspace-based calibration algorithms. Simulations and experimental results are included to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据